Sapping Attention

Digital Humanities: Using tools from the 1990s to answer questions from the 1960s about 19th century America.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Mad Men anachronism hunting

›
[Update: I've consolidated all of my TV anachronisms posts at a different blog, Prochronism , and new ones on Mad Men, Deadwood, Downton...
13 comments:
Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Do women hide their gender by publishing under their initials?

›
A quick follow-up on this issue of author gender . In my last post, I looked at first names as a rough gauge of author gender to see who ...
7 comments:

Evidence of absence is not absence of evidence

›
I just saw that various Digital Humanists on Twitter were talking about representativeness, exclusion of women from digital archives, and o...
7 comments:
Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Journal of Irreproduced results, vol. 1

›
I wanted to try to replicate and slightly expand Ted Underwood's recent discussion of genre formation over time using the Bookworm data...
2 comments:
Monday, February 20, 2012

Downton Abbey Anachronisms, Season Finale edition

›
[Update: I've consolidated all of my TV anachronisms posts at a different blog, Prochronism , and new ones on Mad Men, Deadwood, Downton...
23 comments:
Sunday, February 19, 2012

Second epistle to the intellectual historians

›
I. The new USIH blogger LD Burnett has a post up expressing ambivalence about the digital humanities because it is too eager to reject book...
2 comments:
Monday, February 13, 2012

Making Downton more traditional

›
[Update: I've consolidated all of my TV anachronisms posts at a different blog, Prochronism , and new ones on Mad Men, Deadwood, Downton...
27 comments:
Thursday, February 2, 2012

Poor man's sentiment analysis

›
Though I usually work with the Bookworm database of Open Library texts, I've been playing a bit more with the Google Ngram data sets la...
5 comments:
Monday, January 30, 2012

Fixing the job market in two modest steps

›
Another January, another set of hand-wringing about the humanities job market. So, allow me a brief departure from the digital humanities. F...
5 comments:
Thursday, January 5, 2012

Practices, the periphery, and Pittsburg(h)

›
[This is not what I'll be saying at the AHA on Sunday morning, since I'm participating in a panel discussion with Stefan Sinclair, T...
4 comments:
Friday, December 16, 2011

Genre similarities

›
When data exploration produces Christmas-themed charts, that's a sign it's time to post again. So here's a chart and a problem. ...
2 comments:
Friday, November 18, 2011

Treating texts as individuals vs. lumping them together

›
Ted Underwood has been talking up the advantages of the Mann-Whitney test over Dunning's Log-likelihood , which is currently more widely...
1 comment:
Monday, November 14, 2011

Compare and Contrast

›
I may (or may not) be about to dash off a string of corpus-comparison posts to follow up the ones I've been making the last month. On th...
3 comments:
Thursday, November 10, 2011

Dunning Amok

›
A few points following up my two posts on corpus comparison using Dunning Log-Likelihood last month. Nur ein stueck Technik. Ted said in...
2 comments:
Thursday, November 3, 2011

Theory First

›
Natalie Cecire recently started an important debate about the role of theory in the digital humanities. She's rightly concerned that th...
1 comment:
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.